<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate change myth #1: The world has been cooling for a decade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://one-blue-marble.com/blog/2008/12/30/climate-change-myth-1-the-world-has-been-cooling-for-a-decade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://one-blue-marble.com/blog/2008/12/30/climate-change-myth-1-the-world-has-been-cooling-for-a-decade/</link>
	<description>Global warming, climate change, activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Kauffman</title>
		<link>http://one-blue-marble.com/blog/2008/12/30/climate-change-myth-1-the-world-has-been-cooling-for-a-decade/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>John Kauffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 04:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://one-blue-marble.com/blog/?p=25#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Good post Richard. Keep fighting the good fight.

This is one that strikes close to home (pun intended). I&#039;ve never been completely satisfied with the debunking of some hurricane talk: specifically that there were supposedly more hurricanes the first half the century, vs the last 50 years (I want to say it was a U of Colorado study of hurricane history from the mid-1800s thru the present, but I&#039;m not sure). I&#039;ve read statistical analyses which discuss intensity and changes in the technology to gather data, but I&#039;ve found it hard to put it simply and convincingly... besides just saying: &quot;You&#039;re wrong. That&#039;s only one, superficial interpretation of one set of data.&quot; I want to say the same data set showed an increased number of the strongest hurricanes (cat 5) over the last 60 years or so, but I&#039;m a terrible debater and this stuff never comes to mind when I need it most.

Maybe this would be a good idea for a new iPhone app? &lt;i&gt;Climate debating for dummies.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Richard. Keep fighting the good fight.</p>
<p>This is one that strikes close to home (pun intended). I&#8217;ve never been completely satisfied with the debunking of some hurricane talk: specifically that there were supposedly more hurricanes the first half the century, vs the last 50 years (I want to say it was a U of Colorado study of hurricane history from the mid-1800s thru the present, but I&#8217;m not sure). I&#8217;ve read statistical analyses which discuss intensity and changes in the technology to gather data, but I&#8217;ve found it hard to put it simply and convincingly&#8230; besides just saying: &#8220;You&#8217;re wrong. That&#8217;s only one, superficial interpretation of one set of data.&#8221; I want to say the same data set showed an increased number of the strongest hurricanes (cat 5) over the last 60 years or so, but I&#8217;m a terrible debater and this stuff never comes to mind when I need it most.</p>
<p>Maybe this would be a good idea for a new iPhone app? <i>Climate debating for dummies.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

